Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - ERP SCM Logistics Execution
Viewing all 2231 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Material Search

$
0
0

picking strategy for LGR storage type is FIFOLS24.jpg


Re: Material Search

$
0
0

image is from LS24 where you will see that there is stock in LGR still material is picked from LGC

WM stock issue

$
0
0

Hi,

 

We have an issue with WM and MM stocks.

 

In MMBE we have qty 0 for MM stock, but in WM LS24 display 14 ST.

 

We can't clear differences using LX23 because stock is restricted.

We can't do any MM movement.

We tried to make inventory using LI20 but the stock is increased in WM.

 

Is it possible to delete 14 ST in WM without delete LQUA entry ?

 

Thank you.

Julien.

Re: WM stock issue

$
0
0

This was 2 times rejected today.

The reason was given in the note to the rejection, you  (or your colleague, who brought you now into this situation) are ignoring moderation and SCN rules of engagement.

The notes to the rejection can be found by clicking the Actions icon on top right and then going into the Notification tab.

 

Discussion locked

Re: Material Search

$
0
0

Hi Kiran,

 

There could be many reasons. Before we get into further details, could you please check if search is excluding LGR or i'ts picking the bin LGC from another criteria in T334T?

 

Thanks,

Venn

Re: Material Search

$
0
0

Check below.

 

whether you are using any storage type indicators, if so it should maintained in material master data.

required stock is in available stock or not.

inventory active for bin.

Re: Material Search

$
0
0

What is the second column in your screenshot?

If that is a batch number then it might be that the system is looking for a quant with a certain batch which is the case when the batch is already entered in the delivery.

Items in the delivery not accessible to be selected for packing in the HU

$
0
0

Dear All,

 

I have now encountered a issue - I have created a delivery with a specific material( having all the configs done for packing), and now while packing i am not able to select the material to be packed in the HU.

 

In fact a week back , i have created a similar scenario, with the same material, and i could pack the same - now i am not able to do so.

When i go the previous delivery document (successful scenario), i can still unpack and pack again.

 

But now on, i have created many deliveries but not able to pack the material.

 

Please let me know, what would have gone wrong !!

 

Thanking you all in advance for your inputs


Re: Two step confirmation does not work when quantity returned to return bin

$
0
0

Here is what I am trying to do.

 

ST 100 - Reserve storage has a full pallet of stock. 

ST 042 - pick face can only hold half a pallet.

 

Replenish pick face with 1/2 pallet from reserve (St 100)

Remaining 1/2 pallet needs to be returned to ST 100 (doesn't need to be to the same bin location).

 

Three line items are created in the TO:

 

1. Removal of stock from ST 100

2. Placement of stock into ST 042

3. Return of stock to another bin location in ST 100.

 

These are three different steps and I think that I should be able to confirm the first step and them confirm that second step and then confirm the third step.

 

 

Regards,

 

JAConsultant

Program to delete WM transfer orders

$
0
0

Does anybody know of a standard program or user exit that can be used to delete WM transfer requirement - rather than deleting one at a time.

Re: Pick HU not created automatically in EWM

$
0
0

You need to make the following changes Shashi:

 

1) Need to assign right combination of Activity Area and Activity to WOCR determination node in IMG-EWM>Master Data -> WO -> Rule to determine WOCR

2) Ensure right tick for HU creation is maintain in Pack Spec and Pack Profile ( 0BDL is maintained with right master data entries )

3) Ensure that you have assigned a start Bin to Activity Area in: SAP MENU -> Master Data -> Activity Area -> Assign start and end Bin to Activity Area

 

This will enable you to get create pick HU with WO creation.

 

Reward if useful !!

Re: Program to delete WM transfer orders

$
0
0

there is no standard Program to delete multiple TR in one go however you have provision to change the status of multiple TR using Warehouse Activity Monitor(T-Code : LL01) in one go

 

p.JPG

Re: WM End of Year Activity: RLREOLPQ

$
0
0

Hi, Probbaly this could be the performance reasons . System might take much long time when you run online . And hence certain pergrams will be better to run on background . Regards,

MM WM stock issue

$
0
0

Hi,

 

We have a differency between MM and WM stock and we don't know how to correct it.

 

We also try to understand how the diffrency has been generated but it is difficult to analyse because of a lot of MM movements and WM manual transfers has been done by users.

 

There is a lot of discussions about this issue on SCN forum but unfortunately we didn't found any solution to clear WM stock without deleting LQUA entrie.

 

Here is some details about our issue:

 

 

 

Transaction LS24: WM stock = 14 ST.

1.JPG

 

Transaction MMBE: MM stock = 0

2.JPG

 

We have executed LX23 to try to correct differencies:

 

3.JPG

We have -14 ST, it is ok, but LX23 doesn't generate any batch input to correct WM stock.

 

4.JPG

 

By reading saphelp for LX23 we can see that negative stocks can't be corrected.

 

5.jpg

 

 

We also tried to do a transfert posting using MIGO to unrestricted stock but it is not possible beaucause MM stock is 0.

 

6.jpg

 

Is it possible to correct this issue without deleting LQUA entrie ?

It seems that we can't do movements using MIGO.

 

Thank you very much.

 

Julien.

Re: MM WM stock issue

$
0
0

Hi Julien,

 

You probably did a 551 movement type to PGI of scrapping. It does the material movement in MM-IM (as you can see in MMBE). But in WM, the stock will be at storage type 999 in SCROOTT position.

 

You must create a TO to adjust this stock. If you do not want to use LT01 or LT10 to do it. YOu must define the 'TR Create transfer requirement" indicator for IM-mvt-553.So the movement will appear in LB10 to process it.

 

Regards.

 

Gian Carvalho


Re: MM WM stock issue

$
0
0

1) The batch shown in LS24 doesn't match with MMBE.

2) The batch stock shown in LS24 lying under restricted category hence the system not allows you to transfer.

 

Please check my inputs in your system.

Re: WM End of Year Activity: RLREOLPQ

HU Loading Process without Transportation Management

$
0
0

Hi all,

 

We are configuring the shipping process without TM. So the business flow is:

 

--> Create Sales Order

--> Create Delivery

--> Create TO and Picking (RF)

--> Packing (using packing station) to generate HU

--> Load HU (using LM31)

--> PGI from Delivery

 

However the system allow us to do PGI without the HU loading process. How can I handle this since I do not use TM? To turn obligatory the loading of HUs.

 

Is there any badi/exit or configuration to do it?

 

Thanks

Gian

Re: WM End of Year Activity: RLREOLPQ

$
0
0

Thanks for replying. I did run this in the foreground in our UAT system and it was very quick so it seems not to be a performance issue (at least in UAT system)

The only possible advantage I can identify is that if I run it in the background with the timing set to "Immediate" then I will be able to see the completion status in SM37 for all of the variants.

Apart from this I am struggling to see any value

Re: WM End of Year Activity: RLREOLPQ

$
0
0

Rosh, thanks for taking the time to post, but I already knew this.

I am trying to find out why SAP recommend that the RLREOLPQ programme is run in the background and not in the foreground

Viewing all 2231 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>